The thread originally started for this topic, here (thanks to my retarded posting without the benefit of an Edit button) became very cluttered and messy. And I wanted to include an important addition to it, without thoroughly confusing everyone with an 'unreadable' mess. So, sorry for the 'double-up' - but hence this new 'old' thread. 
As the thread title (above) suggests, the following example is about removing table items (values) when the index number assigned to it is unknown. But with one important difference. This one is a variation on the previous examples because it demonstrates removal of the table item WITHOUT causing the indices of the remaining table items to shift. It's a subtle difference but an important one, if requiring table items (in regards their index-numbers and associated values) to remain consistent.
Nb.
For convenience, have also attached is a zipped-file containing examples from the original (aforementioned) thread. It's just to save people the hassle of 'thread-jumping' back to the original and trying to sort thru the abysmal mess there. (LOL - no EDIT button, IR. Hint!). In fact, just consider that particular thread as now 'defunct'.
As the thread title (above) suggests, the following example is about removing table items (values) when the index number assigned to it is unknown. But with one important difference. This one is a variation on the previous examples because it demonstrates removal of the table item WITHOUT causing the indices of the remaining table items to shift. It's a subtle difference but an important one, if requiring table items (in regards their index-numbers and associated values) to remain consistent.
Nb.
For convenience, have also attached is a zipped-file containing examples from the original (aforementioned) thread. It's just to save people the hassle of 'thread-jumping' back to the original and trying to sort thru the abysmal mess there. (LOL - no EDIT button, IR. Hint!). In fact, just consider that particular thread as now 'defunct'.
Comment