The signature cannot be copied by CD-R burners, thus protecting the application if the user has an illegal copy.
But.
There are tools that make it possible, through emulation, to (a) record the delays, (b) store information about the delays on the disc, (c) hide this information from SecuROM, and (d) use that information to "recreate" (emulate) the delays when the data is read. The end result is technically not a 1:1 copy, but is a 100% working copy nonetheless. And the tools make it absolutely easy to do.
Of greater concern is the issue that several users have with SecuROM protected discs. Some drives have trouble reading the delays consistently, and the SecuROM software itself can cause some problems. On many drives it introduces significant delays in initiating data reads whenever the security check is performed.
It is often said that copy protection does more to hinder legitimate users than it serves as a deterrent to illegal copying...but I understand the need to do what you can. (As a wise man once told my father, "locks are only there to keep an honest man honest.") Still, one of the rules of security is to guard against thinking you're more secure than you are.
The sad fact is that any copy protection can be circumvented. There are only varying degrees of difficulty in doing so.
I would personally give some consideration to whether the cost of SecuROM (or any copy protection scheme) is really worth it.
Leave a comment: